It is now early morning, the first trading day after the S&P downgrade of US debt from AAA to AA+.
Gold has spiked higher, most recently, from prices in the $1660 range to prices in the $1710 range.
I wrote last week about the correlation of the gold price and the national debt. 
Many now feel that gold has become an "obvious" investment.
I see it differently.
I think that gold was already the evident (not yet obvious) way to go in 2001, following the crash of the internet bubble - which even at that time was fuelled by Federal Reserve money printing and US government debt (Remember? It seemed like a big bubble at the time....).
If gold was the evident go-to investment in 2001, then by 2003, it had reached the stage of obviousness that the metal of kings would preserve its value better than any currency that was backed by a central bank whose members (and later chairmen) used helicopter analogies when talking about how to stimulate a slowing economy!
It just took some folks a little longer to catch on (for example, by buying at $1710 today, rather than at $330 in 2003!)....I'm still waiting for gold stocks to trade at "bubble valuations," as the NASDAQ did in the 1990s - oh yes, and still does!
In fact, the better gold miners are trading at roughly a 60% discount (or more) to the value of their gold in the ground (after production costs). John Doody has calculated that his top ten gold stocks can easily double as a group, just to reach their inherent value at $1500 gold (Wait, isn't gold now $1700? Oh yes, he was writing last month!).
Gold has been "obvious" for the past 8 years and for the past $1400 in appreciation.
My advice?Stick with the obvious.
This is the gold tsunami._
No comments:
Post a Comment